Pupil Premium
Please read the information below which gives details of our Pupil Premium Grant and how we allocate the funding.
Pupil premium strategy statement
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.
School overview
Detail | Data |
School name | Frenchwood Community Primary School |
Number of pupils in school | 343 |
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils | 23% |
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3-year plans are recommended) | 2025-26, 2026-27, 2027-28 |
Date this statement was published | 19.12.2025 |
Date on which it will be reviewed | September 2026 |
Statement authorised by | Cathryn Antwis, Headteacher |
Pupil premium lead | Susan Wilkinson, SENDCo |
Governor / Trustee lead | Muhammad Isap, Pupil Premium Link Governor |
Funding overview
Detail | Amount |
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year | £121,200 |
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) | £0 |
Total budget for this academic year If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year | £121,200 |
Pupil premium strategy plan
Statement of intent
Context
Key Principles At Frenchwood Community Primary School we aim for all our learners to achieve their full potential, irrespective of their background or the challenges they face. We endeavour to understand the individual needs of each pupil, discover their talents and challenges, and put provision in place that will enable them to achieve success. The Pupil Premium (PP) funding that is received by school annually is used in a variety of ways to improve pupil attainment and help overcome barriers to learning. In making provision for socially disadvantaged pupils, we recognise that not all our pupils who receive Free School meals (FSM) will be socially disadvantaged. We also recognise that not all pupils who are socially disadvantaged are registered or qualify for PP. We therefore allocate the PP funding to support any pupil or groups of pupils we have identified as being at social disadvantage. Quality first teaching in every classroom is the primary driver for success in our school, alongside careful assessment of need. Well trained staff and consistency in our approach to learning is integral to our strategy. Our school is organised into four phases with staff teams working closely together to offer the best we can to all our learners by utilising the range of expertise within our team. This offers a flexible model that enables us to adjust when circumstances change. High priority is given to supporting good mental health, building resilience and developing positive learning behaviours. Ultimate Objectives
|
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
Challenge number | Detail of challenge |
1 | Observations and screening of expressive and receptive language skills show that a significant number of pupils have communication skills significantly below age expected levels. This is particularly prevalent in EYFS and KS1 but continues to have impact throughout school. Many disadvantaged pupils have vocabulary gaps, especially those who speak and understand English with a proficiency below ‘C’. |
2 | Assessments, observations and discussions show that disadvantaged pupils generally have greater difficulties with phonics than their peers. This negatively impacts their development as readers. |
3 | Assessments, observations and discussions indicate that many disadvantaged pupils have experienced displacement, trauma and disrupted education. This has resulted in significant knowledge gaps leading to pupils falling further behind age-related expectations, especially in writing and maths. |
4 | Surveys, observations and discussions indicate a rising number of pupils, particularly disadvantaged pupils, who are experiencing significant emotional and social problems with many lacking opportunities for accessible enrichment experiences. This impacts attainment and attendance. |
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
Intended outcome | Success criteria |
Pupils to be able to communicate confidently, articulating their thoughts and feelings in an age-appropriate manner. | Assessments and observations indicate significantly improved oral language among disadvantaged pupils. This is evident when triangulated with other sources of evidence, including engagement in lessons, pupil book study and ongoing formative assessment. |
Pupils, particularly those who are disadvantaged, are ready for the next phase in their education as they are fluent and confident readers, writers and mathematicians. Their skills enable them to engage fully in a broad curriculum. | By the end of KS2:
|
Pupils are resilient and well organised learners who are emotionally literate and able to manage themselves in a variety of circumstances. | Across school there will be high levels of wellbeing / mental health demonstrated by:
|
All pupils, but particularly those who are disadvantaged, receive their full entitlement to education through good attendance, punctuality and access to enrichment activities, giving them the best chance of success. | High levels of attendance across all phases and groups.
|
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching
Budgeted cost: £46,800
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
1:10 adult to pupil ratio in EYFS & KS1 to enable increased communication modelling and dialogue in continuous provision | Our staff have been trained in the Hanen approach to communication and language. This emphasises the importance of spoken language and verbal interaction for young children. Research shows that children’s language development benefits from approaches that explicitly support communication through talking, verbal expression, modelling language and reasoning. | 1 |
2 additional TA3 employed to ensure consistency of staffing throughout the day and enable timely focussed interventions to take place. | Positive effects have been found in studies where teaching assistants deliver high-quality structured interventions which deliver short sessions, over a finite period, and link learning to classroom teaching.
| 1,2,3 |
50% increase in SENDCo time. This is to enable effective leadership of whole school approach to self-regulation, identification of needs and timely intervention. | Research by Bath Spa University and Nasen recommends increasing SENDCo protected time to take account of numbers of children in crisis. | 1,2,3,4 |
Whole staff access to RWInc online video updates and termly visits from consultant trainer
Phonics lead in school to model phonics sessions, support new to schoolteachers to enable consistency and monitor teaching and assessment of phonics across EYFS and KS1. | Read Write Inc Phonics is a systematic synthetic phonics approach which, when used with fidelity, explicitly teaches pupils a comprehensive set of letter-sound relationships in a pre-planned sequence. There is extensive evidence that this benefits Key Stage 1 pupils’ learning, and older pupils who struggle to decode. | 2 |
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £55,700
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Wellcomm Early Years assessment used with all EYFS pupils to identify communication / language baselines, tailor intervention and to measure progress made. | Communication and language approaches emphasise the importance of spoken language and verbal interaction for young children. They are based on the idea that children’s language development benefits from approaches that explicitly support communication through talking, verbal expression, modelling language and reasoning. | 1 |
Wellcomm Primary assessment used with all pupils in Y1 (or on arrival if later) to identify communication / language baselines, tailor intervention and to measure progress made | Oral language interventions with frequent sessions (3 times a week or more) over a sustained period appear to be most successful. Wellcome Primary includes structured activities for use 1:1 or in small groups to support progress. | 1 |
Pupils with English as an additional language assessed for English language proficiency in Y3 (or on arrival if later) to identify language baseline, tailor intervention and to measure progress made. | EAL learners at all levels need to be given opportunities to grow their English vocabulary range. This could be done by taking advantage of their first language(s) through translation, the use of flashcards and images. It is important to remember to develop the learner’s academic language skills, for instance by focusing on the differences between formal and informal vocabulary. | 1 |
Many of our disadvantaged pupils present as or have SEND - 1:1 and small group interventions delivered and measured using SMART plans:
| Investing in professional development for teaching assistants to deliver structured interventions can be a cost-effective approach to improving learner outcomes. Our TAs are trained in specific interventions that they deliver and measure. These interventions are monitored and reviewed by SENDCo and during pupil progress meetings. | 1,2,3,4 |
Online support interventions that can be accessed independently:
| Flash Academy offers individualised language learning and vocabulary development with home languages Lifting Barriers This study included around 1,200 students and confirmed that IDL produces significantly faster reading and spelling related improvements than non-specialist teaching methods – with an average 10 months improvement in reading and 11 months improvement in spelling after just 26 hours on the IDL programme. IDL Maths Trial – positive results showing 94% of pupils made accelerated progress from individual starting points. | 1,2,3 |
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £ 34,000
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Learning mentor trained as Emotional Literacy Support Assistant (ELSA) offers personalised support packages and liaises with parents of pupils receiving ELSA interventions. | Shotton and Burton (2019) suggest that schools should recognise the need to plan additional support to address the emotional needs of students in the same way that support would be provided to enhance academic learning for children experiencing learning difficulties. ELSAs are trained to develop interventions in the areas of:
| 4 |
Free breakfast club for pupils who attract FSM funding. After-school sports clubs. | Some pupils are invited to attend to support attendance or encourage engagement in physical activity. | 4 |
All staff participate in Therapeutic Teaching Award. | Relational approaches and building supportive relationships through the school community including auxiliary staff, pupils and parents benefitted the students and led to teachers offering each other more peer support (Howell et al., 2019). TIP training which included more methods for responding to trauma reduced numbers of students being referred to special education and being categorised as troublesome students (Banks and Meyer, 2017; Pemberton and Edeburn, 2021). Practices which included non-verbal approaches to self-regulation and innovative teaching methods such as creative and outdoor materials supported students in building trust and reduction of trauma responses (Mulholland and O’Toole, 2021). | 4 |
Nurture Spaces to be maintained and staffed. | 4 | |
Enrichment offers extended to promote attendance, wellbeing and positive relationships, e.g. Crafternoons’, small group trips, subsidised events. | ‘Beyond the classroom: the role of enrichment in tackling the school absence crisis’ (The Centre for Young Lives (CfYL)2025) | 4 |
Total budgeted cost: | £ 136,500 |
Additional allocation from school budget | £15,300 |
Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes (against 2022-2025 intentions)
Outcomes 2025 |
Pupils to be able to communicate confidently and be able to understand and articulate their thoughts and feelings in an age-appropriate manner. |
Classroom observations show consistency of approach that is beginning to have an impact on classroom discussions, particularly in the use of sentence starters and modelled responses. |
Pupils are ready for the next phase in their education as they are fluent and confident readers, writers and mathematicians. Their skills enable them to engage fully in a broad curriculum. |
Whilst disadvantaged pupils achieved well against their peers in reading and writing, they scored less well in mathematics. Of the 11 pupils in the cohort who are both disadvantaged and have been at Frenchwood since Year 1, 4 scored 99 in the SATs test. Whilst this is 1 point short of the expected standard, it is reasonable to suggest that they are ready for the next stage in their education. |
Pupils are resilient and well organised learners who are emotionally literate and able to manage themselves in a variety of circumstances. |
|
Pupils receive their full entitlement to education through good attendance and punctuality, giving them the best chance of success. |
Attendance excludes non-compulsory age pupils Whole school: Attendance 93.4% Disadvantaged pupils: Attendance 91.3% Not disadvantaged pupils: Attendance 94.3%
Gap reduced by 3.1pp in 2022-23 Gap reduced by a further 2.2pp in 2023-24 Gap maintained at 2023/4 level in 2024-25
|